SIG Talk Gun Forum

Universal %100 background checks on all gun sales what st ye.

This is a discussion on Universal %100 background checks on all gun sales what st ye. within the Guns forums, part of the Gun Forum category; Originally Posted by trouble Exactly, you want to keep your kids safe? Get them out of public school, period. Lashing out at the tool that ...


Go Back   SIG Talk > Gun Forum > Guns

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-21-2012, 09:27 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
bearone2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by trouble View Post
Exactly, you want to keep your kids safe? Get them out of public school, period. Lashing out at the tool that was used by human hand is ignorant in the extreme. There is NO LAW that can prevent one person from killing another, period. This is just kneejerk overemotional idiocy. I had nothing to do with this, how is punishing me accomplishing anything? It doesn't, so some kids got killed, so what? Happens every day of the week in our major cities, how many kids are killed by cars daily? Don't see any protests against cars or bicycles, seriously this is so stupid.
if no law, then how do folks get charged with 1st degree murder?
bearone2 is online now  
Register

Welcome to the SIG Talk Forum dedicated to SIG Sauer Pistols and SIG Sauer Rifles.

We welcome everyone and the community is free to join so register today and become part of the SIG Talk Forum!

Old 12-21-2012, 09:40 AM   #22
SIG News Contributor
 
txshurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greater Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearone2 View Post
if no law, then how do folks get charged with 1st degree murder?
Operable word is "PREVENT".


But I think it's misused. There is NO GUN that can PREVENT someone from being killed, either. It's how each are used as deterrents.
If the laws were enforced consistently and were not subject to all of the loopholes and corruption of the legal system, then it would probably be a better deterrent than armed citizens.

Last edited by txshurricane; 12-21-2012 at 09:43 AM.
txshurricane is offline  
Old 12-21-2012, 10:34 AM   #23
Member
 
Buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirsigalot View Post
Sirsigalot here
In the wake of losing our children to an unstable lad willing a tool/ recurasnal device to us it had me do some soul searching. In the Sunny State of Fl, we have no universal backgrounds check on all firearm sale laws on the books. So I'm here to say I can compromise in that way. It's not much but it's something.
I am very pro-gun, pro 2nd amendment. The right to keep and bear arms is a given right by our forefathers to protect against an over reaching government. While I respect your compassionate compromise, we know that confiscation will not work (people in the US give up over 300 million guns?)and privacy to health records protect the crazies from being identified.
I thnk a background check in every state is certainly warranted, but but that will only reveal the obvious, not those flying under the radar as threats. until we learn that crazies go to "weapon" free zones and either do away with that or provide protection, this won't stop.

Last edited by Buck; 12-21-2012 at 10:42 AM.
Buck is offline  
Old 12-21-2012, 11:57 AM   #24
Supporting Member
Supporting Member
 
Siggybaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Georgia-North and East of The Big Chicken :-)
Posts: 2,002
Ditto to what others have said. Universal background checks wouldn't have stopped the psycho from getting his hands on guns. His mother obviously had very little common sense to allow him access to guns.

I shouldn't have to do a background check for a private sale. If someone seems a little 'off', I won't be selling them one of my weapons.
Siggybaby is offline  
Old 12-21-2012, 05:26 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Sirsigalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Tallahassee Fl
Posts: 210
Sirsigalot here

Guys i think you all misunderstood me. I know universal back ground checks won't stop people from killing but it would help keep guns out of bad guys hands. I can't remember how many guns i privately sold God forbid some crazy use it in a crime. So what I'm trying to say is the next time i sell a gun i mite not sell it privately.
Sirsigalot is offline  
Old 12-21-2012, 05:44 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
LongShot716's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirsigalot View Post
Sirsigalot here

Guys i think you all misunderstood me. I know universal back ground checks won't stop people from killing but it would help keep guns out of bad guys hands. I can't remember how many guns i privately sold God forbid some crazy use it in a crime. So what I'm trying to say is the next time i sell a gun i mite not sell it privately.
Background checks do not deter crime. Joe Blow criminal does not need to buy your guns. He already gets a steady supply: stolen weapons, weapons smuggled across the Mexican border and weapons from overseas smuggled on board freighters.

Other than NJ and MA, here in CA we have some of the most restrictive gun laws on the books and they do nothing but infringe on the rights of law abiding citizens.

Joe Blow criminal couldn't give a rat's behind about gun laws. As a matter of fact, he loves them because it only makes his job that much easier.
LongShot716 is offline  
Old 12-21-2012, 07:55 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
bearone2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirsigalot View Post
Sirsigalot here

Guys i think you all misunderstood me. I know universal back ground checks won't stop people from killing but it would help keep guns out of bad guys hands. I can't remember how many guns i privately sold God forbid some crazy use it in a crime. So what I'm trying to say is the next time i sell a gun i mite not sell it privately.
it may not be called a universal background check but i don't know of any states that don't do a nics/poc-state fee, check before buying a firearm without a ccw.
bearone2 is online now  
Old 01-10-2013, 08:15 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 118
Background checks will normally catch known criminals, however it won't stop those who have or are being treated for mental issues from buying firearms unless congress changes HIPPA.
Emiller3 is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 07:29 AM   #29
Senior Member
 
Longitude Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: OKC
Posts: 386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emiller3 View Post
Background checks will normally catch known criminals, however it won't stop those who have or are being treated for mental issues from buying firearms unless congress changes HIPPA.
Several Congressmen from my state are considering just this right now. To Wit that EVERYBODY who has been diagnosed with a mental illness have those records accessible to NICS.
Longitude Zero is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 09:01 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
bearone2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longitude Zero View Post
Several Congressmen from my state are considering just this right now. To Wit that EVERYBODY who has been diagnosed with a mental illness have those records accessible to NICS.
sorry, not just mental illness.

only if they are deemed to be a danger to themselves or others & not able to handle own funds, where someone else has a power-of attorney.

va notifies fbi if these conditions are met.
bearone2 is online now  
Old 01-11-2013, 09:18 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
bearone2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggybaby View Post
I think it's pretty obvious that the Communists (er I mean democrats) in our gov't couldn't care less about the kids in Sandy Hook. All they care about is climbing another step to the altar of total gun bans.

Note that background checks never would have stopped Mr. Lanza from killing people. The guy actually shot his own mother in the face 4 times, then stole her guns and her car. The guy committed at least 3 felonies by the time he left her driveway.

We need to have more people institutionalized with proper controls so that we don't have husbands/wifes committing their spouses to get out of marriages like we had in the 20th century. People like Mr. Lanza have no busineess being a part of normal society. Sounds harsh but it's the truth. His actions at S.H.E.S. prove that.
did a psychologist/psychiatrist diagnose & document that he was a danger to society ?

if that doesn't happen, you can't just park 'em in an institution.
bearone2 is online now  
Old 01-11-2013, 09:32 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
SauerSig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 441
I am a simple guy... I still say an armed society is the only safe society and it is the only REAL way to solve anything. Its just that simple.
SauerSig is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 09:36 AM   #33
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NE OH
Posts: 16
Exactly how will background checks be enforced on private sales? There are millions of unregistered firearms out there. Impossible.
greyeyezz is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 09:39 AM   #34
Senior Member
 
bearone2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggybaby View Post
Many have said Adam Lanza wasn't right, so he should have been evaluated. He wasn't, and now we have dozens of people dead because of him.

He should've been evaluated, then institutionalized. The rest of us should not have our rights diminished because of people like him. You may feel otherwise. Then again, you may be like Adam.
shoulda, woulda coulda but it didn't happen.

i agree we shouldn't pay the price.

you're a southern retard.
how many folks you know that, "ain't right" but aren't institutionalized?

"You're correct, but think about it. Who is going to sell a firearm privately if the gov't makes it a felony to do so? Unless you were selling to a friend/family, that guy you meet in the parking lot could be with the BATFE. Then it's time for a visit to 'federal pound you in the ass prison'."

many states already incorporate ftf sales be run thru an ffl.
__________________

Last edited by bearone2; 01-11-2013 at 09:46 AM.
bearone2 is online now  
Old 01-11-2013, 10:04 AM   #35
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 15
I have no issue with stricter gun laws; however, banning guns will not fix the problem. Vetteguy makes a valid point, by criminalizing gun ownership, you will only create a black market for them. Making alcohol illegal was a catalyst for the most profitable years for the Mob.

With that said, I'm ok with stricter gun laws but I doubt they will truly make an impact on individuals with bad intentions. I do wish there was a way to include medical and psychiatric information into back ground checks. That is something I believe would help.
Tennessee Honey is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 11:22 AM   #36
SIG News Contributor
 
txshurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greater Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggybaby View Post
Then why exactly are you "ok with stricter gun laws"?
Why are you not?
txshurricane is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 11:27 AM   #37
Senior Member
 
SauerSig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 441
Because it doesn't solve anything. Chicago has proven that.
SauerSig is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 11:28 AM   #38
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siggybaby View Post
Then why exactly are you "ok with stricter gun laws"?
Just because I don't think they will help does not mean that they will not. My problem with gun laws is that less than 2% of guns are used in a malicious manner. So aiming gun laws at less than 2% of gun owners is like looking for a needle in a haystack.

But...

If stricter gun laws (deeper background checks, waiting periods, etc..) will keep even a few guns out of the hands of some scumbags then it might be worth considering. My problem is that most suggested changes only affect those that acquire their firearms legally (which are usually not the ones involved in the 2%).
Tennessee Honey is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:07 PM   #39
Senior Member
 
arclight610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 390
I don't believe in the whole felony = life with no guns and not being able to vote in the first place. If you are safe enough to be back on the streets, you have paid your debt to society and your rights should be reinstated. However, there wouldn't be as many paroled felons in my system...

Murder = Death Penalty
Attempted Murder = Life or Death Penalty depending on circumstances
Armed Robbery = Life or Death Penalty
Rape = Death Penalty
Child Molestation = Death Penalty
arclight610 is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:15 PM   #40
SIG News Contributor
 
txshurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greater Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by arclight610 View Post
I don't believe in the whole felony = life with no guns and not being able to vote in the first place. If you are safe enough to be back on the streets, you have paid your debt to society and your rights should be reinstated. However, there wouldn't be as many paroled felons in my system...

Murder = Death Penalty
Attempted Murder = Life or Death Penalty depending on circumstances
Armed Robbery = Life or Death Penalty
Rape = Death Penalty
Child Molestation = Death Penalty
I agree mostly, with one caveat: the justice system is rife with corruption. The Houston Crime Lab was found to be corrupt a couple of years ago, and at least one death penalty was overturned. Now the state is paying a man and his family millions of dollars on a settlement for incarcerating him for 20 years for a crime that he committed by consensus...but was unprovable because the evidence was tainted.

That one example has really decrease my faith in letting the justice system dole out true justice. The consequences for breaking the law should absolutely be reformed...but what real impact that makes on crime may be lost in the human factor.
txshurricane is offline  
Reply

  SIG Talk > Gun Forum > Guns


Search tags for this page
bench warrant issued to wrong person because of data entry error
,
cwp universal background checks
,
does the nics know if you are taking a controlled substance
,
gun background check criteria
,
how would universal background check affect personal sales
,
universal background check private sale
,
universal gun background check criteria
,

what is a universal background check

,
what is the universal background check
,
what is universal background checks
,
why private sellers shouldn't have to do background checks
,
will universal gun background checks take effect this year

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar SIG Talk Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Don't buy a universal picatinny mount for you P220 Tenforty SIG Sauer Pistols 1 05-29-2012 03:00 AM
Sig Announces the Universal Adaptive Carbine Platform for Handguns txshurricane News 6 01-11-2012 03:28 PM
Bin Laden's Demise Sparks P226 Sales txshurricane News 5 01-08-2012 08:27 PM


Top Gun Sites Top Sites List

Powered by vBulletin 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright © 2010 - 2013 SIG Talk. All rights reserved.
SIG Talk is a SIG Sauer Firearms enthusiast's forum, but it is in no way affiliated with, nor does it represent SIG Sauer, Inc. of Exeter, NH.