![]() |
This is a discussion on Will any highcap mags be Grandfatherd in. within the Guns forums, part of the Gun Forum category; Sirsigalot here Will I be able to still carry my 15rd mags in my 226 or my 12rd mags in my 229....
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Tallahassee Fl
Posts: 226
| Will any highcap mags be Grandfatherd in.
Sirsigalot here Will I be able to still carry my 15rd mags in my 226 or my 12rd mags in my 229. |
| |
| Register |
| Welcome to the SIG Talk Forum dedicated to SIG Sauer Pistols and SIG Sauer Rifles. We welcome everyone and the community is free to join so register today and become part of the SIG Talk Forum! |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Secret Base at Shangri-La ;)
Posts: 512
|
I haven't heard anyone suggest taking anything away, just limiting or banning. They know there is no way to account for all the magazines out there. I'm in California with the 10 round limit. I carry a P229R or P226R in .40 caliber, and I'm not worried about two fewer rounds in the magazine.
Last edited by SiGDaK; 01-15-2013 at 07:17 PM. Reason: Spelling |
| |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: AZ
Posts: 7,093
|
nobody knows
|
| |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 526
|
A restriction on high-cap mags will probably have to pass Congress. It is not one of the measures he is expected to attempt by Executive Order. But who the hell knows. We'll find out some more specifics tomorrow. |
| |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Crosby, Texas
Posts: 2,293
|
If I understood the Constitutional Lawyer that was interviewed on the radio the other day correctly, they cannot take away something that is already owned by a lawful gun owner. He cited the amendment number, but I can't remember it at the moment. It was another amendment other than the 2nd. He basically said that any ban, if passed, would have to ban future manufacture. I looked for a recorded version of the interview, but was unable to find. The Lawyer's name was Gerald Treese. He is also a Dean at a Texas college. |
| |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Illinois
Posts: 825
|
Sounds like if in New York, you're already porked. Elsewhere, we wait and see. And lobby like all get out.
|
| |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: AZ
Posts: 7,093
|
glad i left ny back in '80.
|
| |
| | #8 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 163
|
It should not affect any existing magazines.
|
| |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 526
| |
| |
| | #10 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Swimming upstream
Posts: 780
|
Depends on the state you live in, I guess. I bought my 229 .40 with 11 mag right before Clinton's mag restriction kicked in that subsequently expired.
|
| |
| | #11 | |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: California
Posts: 3,746
| Quote:
In California, we have had a 10 round capacity restriction. When that became law in California back in the mid-90's, I thought to myself, hey no big deal, I'll just carry an extra magazine and practice my speed reloads. | |
| |
| | #12 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: OKC
Posts: 405
|
From what I understand of the NY law you may keep them but if you are involved in an event and the authorities can show you loaded more into the magazine than is legally allowed you are guilty of a misdemeanor.
|
| |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Arizona
Posts: 154
|
If they take them away it would constitute unlawful confiscation
|
| |
| | #14 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 526
| Quote:
After that first year though, high cap mags will be illegal to possess, regardless of how many rounds are actually in them. Essentially, high-cap mag owners in NY are being given a 1 year grace period to get rid of them. | |
| |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: OKC
Posts: 405
| In my state the term civil disobedience comes to mind here. After all I doubt this type of crap would ever see the light of day in my home state.
|
| |
| | #16 |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: S Florida
Posts: 94
| |
| |
| | #17 |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: ca
Posts: 67
|
NY....is getting a taste of the New Order eh? 7 Bullets no large sodas. What is next no Rocky road Ice cream and the next shooting NOT EVEN in their state they will bring it down to Barney Fife rules? One Bullet, in your shirt pocket. Andy Griffith style!
|
| |
| | #18 |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: St Louis
Posts: 23
|
I would expect almost immediate challenges to at least the mag issues in NY. The issue of making possession of currently legal mags illegal is a blatant violation of the ex post facto clauses of the US Constitution. I seriously doubt it will stand up in court and would expect it to be resolved long before the "grace" period. They can certainly ban sales and prohibit their use going forward - they cannot make them illegal to possess.
|
| |
| | #19 | |
| Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: ca
Posts: 67
| Quote:
Don't get me wrong I am not picking on you but you give folks in your neck of the woods a bit more credit then I think they deserve. | |
| |
| | #20 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: OKC
Posts: 405
| Quote:
There is a HUGE difference between how we handle firearms issues and scum of the earth dopers. IN the PRK people might fold like lawn chairs but in middle America like OK/TX/KS/LA we are made of much sterner stuff than mostly spineless left coasters. No offense intended just facts. Last edited by Longitude Zero; 01-17-2013 at 06:05 AM. | |
| |
![]() |
|
| Search tags for this page |
sig p229 mags,sig sauer pistols banned in new york |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar SIG Talk Discussions | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| P229 mags 13 round flush mags | th3ug1y0n3 | SIG Sauer Pistols | 4 | 09-25-2012 06:35 PM |