Some inconsistencies in layout I noticed here.
SIG 516 Gen 2: I assume the Medium Dot is the normal position; the tab (with the big hole through it) is aligned with the Medium Dot, and is vertical when using this setting.
X - Big Dot - Medium Dot - Small Dot
SIG 716 Gen 2: I'm not sure which one is the normal position; the tab is aligned with the Small Dot, and is vertical when using this setting.
X - Small Dot - Medium Dot - Big Dot
-------------------------
I'm assuming that for both rifles, the X is for total cut - off, the Small Dot is for Suppressors, the Medium Dot is for Regular Use, and the Big Dot is for Adverse Conditions.
Could anyone confirm this?
What I don't get is why the tab isn't vertically arranged with the Medium Dot on the SIG 716.
SIG 516 Gen 2: I assume the Medium Dot is the normal position; the tab (with the big hole through it) is aligned with the Medium Dot, and is vertical when using this setting.
X - Big Dot - Medium Dot - Small Dot
SIG 716 Gen 2: I'm not sure which one is the normal position; the tab is aligned with the Small Dot, and is vertical when using this setting.
X - Small Dot - Medium Dot - Big Dot
-------------------------
I'm assuming that for both rifles, the X is for total cut - off, the Small Dot is for Suppressors, the Medium Dot is for Regular Use, and the Big Dot is for Adverse Conditions.
Could anyone confirm this?
What I don't get is why the tab isn't vertically arranged with the Medium Dot on the SIG 716.