This is a discussion on Using the Decocker within the SIG Sauer Pistols forums, part of the SIG Sauer Forum category; I've been a firearms instructor for 25 years and during that time I have been fortunate enough to train under some of the best in ...
|SIG Sauer Pistols SIG Sauer Pistol Forum: SIG Sauer Pistols - P210, P220, P224, P225, P226, P227, P228, P229, P232, P238, P239, P245, P250, P290, P320, P365, P522, P556, PM400, SP2022, Mosquito,|
| ||LinkBack||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
|04-22-2011, 12:10 PM||#16|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Likes Received 0
I've been a firearms instructor for 25 years and during that time I have been fortunate enough to train under some of the best in the country; Pat Rogers, Louis Awerbuck, Ken Campbell, etc. I have also seen some that are very poor.
Unfortunately for you, you found one that was very poor and very dangerous. Lowering the hammer in this manner disengages the firing pin safety and creates an extremely dangerous situation. You would have been well within your rights to walk off the range and demand a refund.
The lesson learned here is that just because someone is offering a class, and calls himself an instructor, does not mean he has some mystical power that makes him smarter than anyone else. In this case he probably does not deserve to own a gun.
|04-22-2011, 04:18 PM||#18|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Likes Received 1005
I have been a Sig owner since the late 80's... "Wearing out the decocker" is a new one for me. I have heard some pretty lame excuses for not using the decocker, but I think that one just topped my list. The Sig decocking lever's sole purpose is to safely lower the hammer from the cocked position without a round being discharged. The engineers at Sig would not design a system to wear out, especially being a safety device. There would be some liability issues...
Did the instructor also mention that he didn't use real ammo in the gun because he thought that it would wear the firing pin out?
| || |
|04-24-2011, 10:04 AM||#20|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Likes Received 2
This is stupid and here's the technical explanation why:
The decocker in theory COULD wear out, and when I say COULD wear out I am saying the arm on the decocking lever that moves the sear out of the way so that the hammer can return to the DA position COULD break off - in the same sense that your frame COULD break in half.
Seriously, all the decocking lever does is manipulate the sear out of the way - the safety lever and firing pin safety never engage and puts the hammer back on the DA position with some help from the mainspring housing.
If the "instructor" and I use that term loosely says he does not want to wear out his decocker, he should not be wearing shoes, lest he wear out the soles.
|04-25-2011, 09:43 AM||#21|
You guys are way overblowing this. I don't mean to be Mr. Argumentative, and I understand the concern for safety, but let's really think about this.
First of all: the muzzle shouldn't be pointed in the direction of any person at any time, regardless of how the hammer is being let down.
People who trust safety mechanisms and de-cockers 100%...are people who have accidents. Those mechanisms are backup options for common sense and personal responsibility.
I agree that the "it could wear out" excuse is really, really lame. It would have been better had he said, "I don't trust it".
And for the record: I don't intend to ever buy a double-action handgun without a de-cocker. Just in case I don't like the hammer tension.
But to all the puritans who are decrying this instructor: I'd like to know how you think a 1911 or a lever-action rifle should be de-cocked.
In which case, it's entirely possible that the firing safety could still be used as a fall-back should your thumb fail.
|04-25-2011, 01:40 PM||#22|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Likes Received 0
I'm with you on this one, but my thoughts on the 1911 are that you really don't decock the 1911 while there is a round in the chamber. That's primarily why they have the hammer guard. Frankly, if I tried decocking my Ed Brown with a round in the chamber I'd have it going off half the time. That hammer cannot be eased forward very easily. It is simply wicked.
That being said, my Kimber 1911 is easy to decock and the sig 226 I just got does not seem to be a big issue. No matter what, I'd just be dang sure the pistol was pointed somewhere safe or at least at someone I don't like (kidding here, just kidding)
So yea, I agree, ease up on the instructor. He might not trust the decocker. It's understandable.
|04-25-2011, 02:46 PM||#23|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Likes Received 65
It's my understanding, someone corerect me if I am wrong, that when one pulls the trigger to decock using the thumb on the hammer method, the safeties are disengaged ( that's why we can fire the gun). The decocker works while keeping the safeties in place.
One slip of the thumb and 'BANG', regardles of direction, that's not a good situation.
I respectfully disagree with giving this instructor a break. He did not say he did not trust it, he said it could wear out. That's beyond poor word choice in my opinion.
As far as 1911's are concerned, their safety system is built around the manual safety and grip safety. One does not decock, they put the manual safety on.
DAO's automatically decock as part of their function, no comparison to be made here.
|04-25-2011, 06:01 PM||#24|
I'm getting quite a laugh at the anonymous down-votes on my post above. Obviously there are at least two people in this world who have forgotten that de-cockers are a fairly recent development.
These are the same people that would leave a car in neutral and set the parking brake. Derp derp.
That's rhetorical, by the way - I understand that you're not necessarily disagreeing.
So, as far as Sigs go - as long as you don't hold the trigger, your thumb can slip and the gun still wouldn't fire. Theoretically.
Just a quick side note: I know an Army vet who de-cocked a Beretta PX4 Storm using the de-cocker, and it fired. Beretta inspected it and found it to be of sound manufacturing. They did nothing but clean it and send him some safety tips. I didn't want to mention it at first, because it was an embarrassing incident and I was afraid people would take potshots at him without knowing the context, but since it's appropriate to the conversation...there you have it. Once again: people who trust firearms safeties unconditionally are people who have accidents.
|04-26-2011, 01:11 AM||#25|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Likes Received 65
Sorry, I am not basing firearm safety on "as long as". The point is you still have to pull the trigger and that sudden forward motion of the hammer is the most likely risk of a slip.
Decockers my be recent, but I would bet, in part, they were developed for the very reason I described.
I do not question the example you provided as I am not familiar with it, but even putting a car in park or gear can fail too.
|04-26-2011, 04:53 AM||#26|
The bottom line for me from this discussion is: the only truly, 100% safe way to de-cock any firearm is to do it on an empty chamber. How you do it, then, becomes a discretionary matter.
This is true for rifles, it's true for 1911s, and it's true for double actions. Anything less than that is a risk, and it's up to the user to decide how to best avoid an accidental or negligent discharge.
I don't believe that anyone who is just foolish enough to use the de-cocker on any loaded pistol has any clout saying that someone else is somehow less qualified to handle firearms because they de-cock an unloaded pistol by the hammer.
|04-26-2011, 12:26 PM||#27|
Copied directly from SIG P226 Owner's Manual :
4.3 Loading the pistol (ready to fire)
1. Point the pistol in a safe direction.
2. Insert a full magazine and ensure it is engaged.
3. Pull the slide back fully and release, allowing the slide to fly forward.
4. Push down the decocking lever with your thumb (Not valid for DAO/DAK pistols).
2.1.3 What You Should Know About the Decocking Lever
The decocking lever on the SIG SAUER pistol is designed for the express purpose of
decocking the firearm. The reason it is there is because it is not safe practice to decock a
pistol by pulling the trigger and attempting to ease the hammer forward manually.
To decock your pistol, push down the decocking lever (keep your finger OFF the trigger while
you do this).
|04-26-2011, 12:31 PM||#28|
Copied directly from SIG P226 Owner's Manual Part 2:
Always use the decocking lever to decock your SIG SAUER pistol. This is the only way to
safely lower the hammer from the cocked position and prevent an accidental discharge. This
warning applies to all pistols with decocking levers.
The positive way to safely lower the hammer is by use of the decocking lever. Never lower
the hammer by pulling the trigger and attempting to ease the hammer forward manually.
Manually lowering the hammer is dangerous and prevents full application of the pistol’s
The decocking lever is the only proper means of lowering the hammer and assuring that the
hammer rests in the intercept notch.
DO NOT THUMB THE HAMMER DOWN:
the consequence can be serious injury or death –
only and ALWAYS use the decocking
|04-26-2011, 02:11 PM||#30|
|Search tags for this page|
decocker sig purpose,
how do you decock sao p226,
how does the decocking feature in a sig mosquito work,
how to decock a sig 228,
how to use a decocker,
how to use a p226 decocker,
how to use decocker on sig 229,
how to use decocking lever on sis sauer mosquito,
my decocker on my sp2022 doesn't return all the way to the top,
sig sauer 1911 22 decocker,
sig sauer mosquito decocking lever,
sig sp2022 how to use decocking lever
Click on a term to search for related topics.
|Similar SIG Talk Discussions|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|P224 decocker lever||egerba||SIG Sauer Gunsmithing||14||10-18-2018 01:36 AM|
|P226-SE-SL: Decocker AND Manual Safety....?||MoRivera||SIG Sauer Pistols||9||05-28-2018 03:08 PM|
|P226 Decocker||chingy1998||SIG Sauer Gunsmithing||8||10-28-2017 03:54 AM|
|P229 Legion - First Sig. Decocker question.||TrueAncient||Legion Series||17||02-23-2017 07:01 PM|
|Standard Decocker came on NEW Legion||Greenlit||Legion Series||20||02-10-2017 06:37 AM|